• Philippine Top Blogs
    Politics & Government - Top Blogs Philippines
    (Politics and government category)
  • Most Read Posts

  • Topics by Category

  • Archives

  • Calendar

    February 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan   Mar »
  • Disclaimer

    While this blog observes proper attribution, it is also encouraged that original owner of photos, graphics, and other pieces of information published without attribution herein should inform or call the attention of the executive editor of the Philippine Review for immediate rectification. Concerns may be e-mailed to:


    or posted directly as comment.

    For other concerns, send an SMS or call at: (+63) 9054418132.

    Views expressed and presented on this blog were solely from the writer’s opinion, unless otherwise expressed therein.

    COMMENTS are moderated. This blog reserves its full discretion and responsibility to drop comments irresponsible and inimical to the general moral and intellectual health to both the readers and the blog itself.

    Reproduction, re-blog, or re-post of contents from this blog, in part or in whole is allowed, PROVIDED, proper attribution shall be observed.

    Protected by Copyscape Originality Checker

    Blog Directory Top Blog Sites
    Blog Promotion, Promote Your Blog
    Submit Blog, Blog Directory Submission

    Blogs Blog Tools Promote Blog

Sufficing betrayal of public trust may be NONJUSTICIABLE; Senate verdict remains partisan!

Senator-Judge Joker Arroyo (File Photo from manilabuzz.tumblr.com)

On day 11 of Chief Justice Renato C. Corona impeachment case proceeding in the Senate, sitting as the impeachment court, the Senate has arrived at the most substantial issue of the case when Senator-Judge Joker Arroyo addressed the court in hearing evidence only for impeachable offenses, which was strongly supported by Senator-Judge Francis “Chiz” Escudero. 

Section 2, Article XI, Accountability of Public Officers of the 1987 Philippine Constitution provides that

The president, the vice-president, members of the Supreme Court, members of the Constitutional Commissions, and the ombudsman may be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of: culpable violation of the Constitution, treason, bribery, graft and corruption, other high crimes, or betrayal of public trust.

However, though the Constitution provides impeachable category of crimes, the same does not specifically or absolutely define crimes as impeachable offenses. Hence, the Constitution may imply that committing impeachable offenses is committing high and real criminality that may pose grave threat and danger to the public and to the nation as a whole. Why? Because the Constitution implies respect of the sanctity of the impeachable high public officials so as not to be used and abused as they are vulnerable to the ire of political scrutiny.

Hence, then, geniuses of the legal field would agree in concluding that the question of whether or not Chief Justice Corona committed an impeachable offenses sufficient to removal from office is NONJUSTICIABLE.  It can not be construed based on judicial authority and objectivity as to categorize the charged offenses as impeachable or not especially on the charge against betrayal of public trust.  In other words, even if the Senate sitting as the impeachment court guaranteed by the Constitution, does it follow to having the sole authority of defining absolutely, especially on defining specifically what are those crimes impeachable under betrayal of public trust, where in fact even the Constitution doesn’t have its specified definition?

Well, under the pain of nonjusticiability, the Senate sitting as the impeachment court shall be expected to vote ACQUITTAL in favor of Chief Justice Corona. Furthermore, the Senate must learn the lessons from the history of impeachment cases, especially in the United States, where the Philippine has patterned its impeachment proceedings.

Who would have dared to contest the majority votes of Democrats for acquittal of President Clinton impeachment case where public morality versus private morality was under the ire of political clash? Normally, common people may assert that former President Clinton not only committed grave misconduct but also committed a crime under betrayal of public trust. However, the Senate acquitted Clinton.

Then, would the Philippine Senate mark history to convict the chief justice? Either or not, the Senate verdict would be still PARTISAN in favor of conscience!




About these ads

4 Responses

  1. [...] Sufficing betrayal of public trust may be NONJUSTICIABLE; Senate verdict remains partisan! [...]

  2. [...] Sufficing betrayal of public trust may be NONJUSTICIABLE; Senate verdict remains partisan! [...]

  3. [...] Sufficing betrayal of public trust may be NONJUSTICIABLE; Senate verdict remains partisan! [...]

  4. [...] Sufficing betrayal of public trust may be NONJUSTICIABLE; Senate verdict remains partisan! [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 543 other followers

%d bloggers like this: